'Bigfoot Hand' found in Canada had its origin unraveled; see this case

Earlier this month, an intriguing discovery in a plantation of trees in Canada put local workers on high alert.

A furry foot was found, leading to speculation about the possible existence of the famous Big Foot roaming around the area. However, the truth behind this mystery was quickly unraveled by a renowned expert.

Jeff Meldrum, professor of anatomy and anthropology at Idaho State University (USA), was consulted by the local C2C portal for comment on the case.

Based on his expertise, the expert categorically stated that the paw found most likely belongs to a common animal in the region: the bear.

Although the find may seem macabre to some, especially those who are enchanted with legends of mythological creatures, it is important to emphasize that there is nothing supernatural or mystical involved.

Lots of feedback on social media

(Photo: Facebook/Joanna Finch/Reproduction)

The news quickly spread through social networks, generating heated discussions and curiosity among Internet users.

A post on Facebook by Joanna Finch, who shared the image of the paw found, received more than 1,700 shares, demonstrating the interest aroused by the subject.

In the published videos, it is possible to see the surprise of the residents with the incredible resemblance of the object to a human hand. "It's amazing how we have jointed fingers and nails," said one person holding the body part.

Another discovery had already caused controversy

In an intriguing archaeological discovery, researchers from the renowned Ohio University, in the United States, revealed that a set of footprints, previously attributed to bears, actually belonged to ancient hominids that inhabited the region of Tanzania.

This revelation, published in the renowned scientific journal Nature, brought to light a debate that had already intrigued experts for years.

Controversy surrounding bear tracks dates back to 1976, when evidence of unusual tracks was located in the region.

However, only now, thanks to a meticulous analysis by the researchers from the University of Ohio, it was possible to unravel the secrets of these mysterious brands.

The study revealed that certain aspects of the footprints' early history did not make sense when attributed to bears.

One feature in particular caught our attention: the big toe was considerably longer than the second toe, a common hominid trait.

In addition, the number of steps taken on two legs was excessive for a bear, which can only walk in this posture for a few meters.

The footprints, which are about 16 centimeters long — equivalent to a child's size 24 shoe — have been dated to approximately 3.7 million years ago, revealing a fascinating window into the past. prehistoric.