On Wednesday, January 11th, the Law that determines that the registration of the Individual Taxpayer Registration (CPF) be the single general registration number throughout the Brazilian territory was sanctioned by the President of the Republic, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, but with some vetoes.
A Law No. 14.534/23 came into force since its publication in the Official Gazette (DOU), but determines certain deadlines for entities and bodies to adapt to the new measures, with 12 months for the adequacy of the citizen service procedures and adequacy of the systems and 23 months for the interoperability between the databases and the entries.
see more
'Barbie' movie predicted to boost Mattel profits…
Japanese company imposes time restriction and reaps benefits
The new law states that the CPF appear in the documents and records of public bodies, professional councils and civil registry, such as death, birth and marriage certificates. In addition, it must also be inserted in identification documents, registration of programs such as PIS/Pasep, military certificate, work portfolio, identification of the
INSS, voter registration card, health cards, National Driver's License and others of the type.However, the law was not approved in full, check out the vetoes made by the Presidency:
- The section that required the Federal Revenue Service to update the database every six months with a few “beats” was vetoed. electronics", procedure carried out by the Superior Electoral Court, a measure that sought to avoid duplication of CPF for a same individual;
- Exceptions and other attributions related to certain federal entities were also vetoed, as this could “restrict access to information and health services, if only this was required as a citizen's identification document, since there are cases in which foreigners and nationals do not have the Person Registration number Physical".
- Another veto was in relation to the section that determined a period of 90 days for the Executive Branch to regulate the new Law. According to the information, “the legislative proposal is unconstitutional, considering that marks a deadline for the Executive Branch to regulate the provisions of this proposition, which violates the principle of separation of powers".
Lover of movies and series and everything that involves cinema. An active curious on the networks, always connected to information about the web.
