Being successful is the desire of many people, but for this to actually happen, it is often necessary to make a change of heart. behavior and thinking about different things. The way of arguing in discussions, for example, needs to be revised. Encounters like these are much more productive for both parties when individuals are concerned with learning from the arguments, not winning the argument.
Arguing to learn is the key
see more
Is it better to eat boiled eggs for lunch or dinner? Find out here
With me-no-one-can: Meet the plant capable of warding off evil eyes
Changing the way we face and take discussions is essential for our personal and intellectual growth, after all, when we stop always trying to win all discussions at all costs, they become a great source of knowledge and opportunities for maturation.
A study by psychologist and marketing professor, Matthew Fisher, focused on finding out what the real benefits of starting to argue in discussions would be in order to learn, or rather, to “be being willing to listen to other perspectives and engaging in a dialogue that is not simply to convince the other person that you are right can lead to all kinds of insights unexpected”.
The psychologist claims that the advantages go far beyond learning new things, but that it also reaches the question that makes you find the real answer to the questions raised in the debate.
How did the study work?
Fisher's research sought to discover whether the way someone argues can interfere to any extent with how he understands what is true about the topic of discussion.
In this way, people were placed in a virtual room in order to discuss important issues. They were divided into two groups: one to discuss in order to win the discussion and another to learn from it.
How does discussion work in order to learn?
It is based on a change of view, using conversation as a means of collaborative exchanges, not tension points, as in this way it is possible to deepen some knowledge about the subjects.
The big question is that those who participated in this type of discussion seemed to see the world in a different way, after all, people were always open to learning more. Therefore, they were relaxed when faced with points of debate and opinions many different. On the other hand, those who sought to win discussions at all costs hardly learned anything new.
They also destabilized emotionally.