Again, Facebook was involved in controversies in the United States of America (USA). The company faces a legal dilemma brought by the Federal Trade Commission of the United States (FCT). The charge leveled against big tech is illegal monopoly.
The FCT says that Facebook would have violated the “antitrust law” of the North American country. The reason for the accusation is based on the purchase of the Instagram and WhatsApp applications. The value of each of them was US$ 1 billion and US$ 19 billion, respectively.
see more
How to get your CNH for free in 2023?
After hacker attacks, Microsoft releases free tools for…
illegal monopoly
In this way, according to the Commission, Mark Zuckerberg's company would be practicing an illegal monopoly. If the complaint is accepted and judged as valid, the consequences can be gigantic.
Facebook would have to sell the other two platforms, if the monopoly was in fact found. This practice is prohibited in the US, as it impedes and stifles the growth of new ventures. When only one company dominates an area of the market, the country's economy is at a disadvantage.
“Market dominated”
In other words, the FCT's accusation is that the US social media market is dominated. On the other hand, one of Facebook's spokespersons retorted the accusation through a press release.
"It is regrettable that despite the court's dismissal of the complaint and finding that it lacked merit for a claim, the FTC chose to pursue this baseless lawsuit."
It is clear then that this is not the first time that Facebook has faced a lawsuit of the same nature. Even though the US court has rejected it, the complaint continues to be filed by the aforementioned Commission.
Still through the note issued, Facebook points out that it always acted in accordance with legal determinations. The acquisitions of WhatsApp and Instagram, according to the note, were "reviewed and approved many years ago".
Even if it is difficult to reverse the initial decision, since the company has authorization, the case is very intriguing. In addition to curiosity, the situation also serves to open discussions about multinational monopolies.
