Correct answer: The nominal regency is not adequate to the standard norm in the following alternatives:
- a) I have a horror of rats.,
- b) He was furious about that. and
- d) The bacteria is not visible with naked eyes.
a) I have a horror of rats.
The name “horror” is a noun that governs the preposition “a”.
The correct sentence would be: I have a horror of rats.
b) He was furious about that.
The name “furious” is an adjective that governs the preposition “with”.
The correct phrase would be: He was furious about it.
c) I remain firm on my goal.
“Firm” governs the preposition “in”. Whoever stays strong, stays strong in something.
Note that “na” is the contraction of “em” + “a”.
d) The bacteria is not visible with the naked eye.
In the sentence, “visible” governs the preposition “a”.
The correct thing would be to say: The bacterium is not visible to the naked eye.
Correct answers:
a) he is worthy in receive a raise.
b) We are able to the office
c) The location is accessible The wheelchair.
d) This product is not compatible
e) I'm anxious per be able to travel again.
f) This movie is inappropriate for sensitive people.
Check below the explanations on the phrase rules:
a) he is worthy of receive a raise.
The name "worthy" is an adjective that requires the use of the preposition "of" (who is worthy, is worthy in something). In the sentence, "worthy" is the ruling term and "to receive a raise" is the ruling term.
In nominal rulership, the complement (governed term) always has a preposition. With "worthy", the preposition "of" is used, because whoever is "worthy" is "worthy" in something.
b) We are able to office
Note that in the sentence there is a subordinate relationship; of dependency. If the information were just "we're ready," the phrase would not express a clear idea; we would probably ask ourselves "fit The what?".
As the word "apt" is a name (in this case, an adjective), this relationship is called nominal conducting.
"Apt" is the regent term to which the term governed (complement) "to the office" is subordinate. who is fit is fit The something. As "cargo" is a masculine word, the preposition "a" + article "o" = ao was used.
c) The location is accessible to wheelchair.
"Accessible" is the name that plays the role of ruling term in the sentence above. The regent term always requires a complement for its meaning to be complete. In this case, as the regent term is a name, the complement must have a preposition.
Note that if the sentence were just "The location is accessible.", the meaning is incomplete; we would probably ask ourselves.: accessible The what?
This answer is given by the complement (also called the "governed term"): the wheelchair. "A" is the preposition that establishes the link between the complement and the ruling term. After all, what is accessible is accessible The something/someone.
When the complement is ruled by a name (adjective, adverb or noun), the rulership is nominal.
d) This product is not compatible with hydrogen peroxide.
The name "compatible" requires the use of the preposition "with"; what is compatible is compatible with something.
When the phrase is governed by a name (noun, adjective or adverb), there is a nominal rulership.
Note that if the information were just "This product is not compatible", it would not be clear what the product is compatible with.
The ruler term always has a ruler term subordinate to it to complement its meaning. In the phrase, "with hydrogen peroxide" performs the function of providing this clarification.
and I am looking forward to be able to travel again.
The name "anxious" requires the use of the preposition "for". who is anxious is anxious per something.
Note: if we say "I'm anxious," it's not clear what the anxiety is about. The complement "for being able to travel again" is responsible for making the sentence more understandable.
Since the term ruler of the sentence is a name (anxious), we have a case of nominal rulership.
f) This movie is unfit for sensitive people.
The name "inappropriate" requires the use of the preposition "to". what is inappropriate is inappropriate for something.
In the sentence, "inappropriate" is the ruling term, and its meaning is complemented by the ruling term "for sensitive people."
Wherever the term ruler is a name, the rulership is nominal.
Correct alternative: a) He is very attached to material goods.
The nominal rulership is wrong in the sentence, as the adjective “attached” requires the use of the preposition “a”, not the preposition “in”.
who is attached is attached The something or The somebody.
So, the correct phrase would be: He is very attached to material possessions.
See why the nominal regency of the other alternatives does not show an error:
b) We are fed up with so many promises.
The adjective “full” requires the use of the preposition “of”.
who is fed up is fed up in something or in somebody.
Thus, “full” is the name and “of so many promises” is the complement.
c) She was suspected of having robbed the store.
The adjective “suspicious” requires the use of the preposition “of”.
who is suspect is suspect in something.
Thus, “suspicious” is the name and “having robbed the store” is the complement.
d) He was uncompromising on this point in the regulation.
The adjective “intransigent” requires the use of the preposition “in”.
Who is uncompromising is uncompromising in something.
Remember that the word "this" is a contraction of "in" + "this"
Thus, “uncompromising” is the name and “at this point of regulation” is the complement.
e) The soldiers' confidence in the chief was unshakable.
The adjective “trust” requires the use of the preposition “in”.
Who has confidence, has confidence in something or someone.
Remember that "no" is a contraction of "em" + "o"
Thus, “trust” is the name and “in the boss” is the complement.
Correct Answers: The nominal regency is incorrect in the following alternatives:
- a) I have a bachelor's degree in Law.
- b) Was prone to substitute sugar for sweetener. and
- c) No one is immune from the virus.
Check the explanations below for each of the alternatives.
a) I have a bachelor's degree in Law
The correct thing would be: I'm a bachelor in Right
"Bachelor" is a name that requires the use of the preposition "in". Who is a bachelor is a bachelor in something.
b) Was prone to substitute sugar for sweetener.
The correct thing would be: I was inclined The replace sugar with sweetener.
The name "prone" requires the use of the preposition "a". who is inclined is inclined The something.
c) No one is immune from the virus.
The correct one would be "No one is immune to the virus."
The name "immune" requires the use of the preposition "a". who is immune is immune The something. In the sentence, since "virus" is a masculine noun, the preposition "a" + article "o" = ao was used.
d) That man is capable of anything.
The regency of the sentence is correct; the name "capable" requires the use of the preposition "of". who is capable is capable in something.
Reply:
The wrong alternatives are:
- b) The nominal rulership is the relationship between a complement and a ruled term.
- d) The nominal regency is the relationship between a name and a regent term.
Read the explanation for each statement to better understand what nominal conducting is:
a) The regent term is the name to which the complement is subordinate. - CORRECT
In nominal rulership, the term ruler is a name (adjective, adverb or noun) that needs a complement to clarify its meaning. This add-on ever starts with a preposition.
Example: He is generous with his children.
Name (ruling term): generous
Complement (governed term): with children
b) The nominal rulership is the relationship between a complement and a ruled term. - WRONG
Nominal rulership is the relationship between a complement and a ruling term. The complement is the governed term itself.
Example: This app is not compatible with my phone.
Name (ruling term): compatible
Complement (regulated term): with my cell phone
c) The term governed is the complement of a name. - CORRECT
The term governed is subordinate to the name (ruling term) and complements its meaning.
Example: Drinking water is essential for health.
Name (ruling term): essential
Complement (governed term): for health
Note that if the information were just "Drinking water is essential.", we would ask ourselves: essential for what? The term governed complements the meaning.
d) The nominal regency is the relationship between a name and a regent term. - WRONG
Nominal rulership is the relationship between a name and a ruled term. The name is the ruling term itself.
Example: I have a lot of admiration for you.
Name (ruling term): admiration
Complement (governed term): by you.
Correct answers:
a) I like Italian music. (Verbal Regency)
In the sentence, the term ruler is a verb (to like) and this is indicative of verbal rulership. Subordinate to the verb is the ruled term "Italian music", which is the complement of the sentence.
Note that the verb is indirect transitive, so the complement is prepositioned; who likes, likes in something/someone
b) The email refers to the project. (Nominal Regency)
The ruling term of the phrase is a name (referent). This is indicative of nominal regency.
In nominal conducting, the complement ever it is prepositioned, that is, it has a preposition. "Referent" requires the use of the preposition "a". Since "project" is a masculine name, "ao" was used (preposition "a" + article "o").
c) I have always been interested in languages. (Nominal Regency)
The adjective "interested" is the ruling term of the sentence. To it, a regulated term (a complement) is subordinated: in languages.
When the regency is nominal, the term regent ever is a name (adjective, adverb or noun) and the complement ever starts with a preposition.
d) I prefer coffee to tea. (Verbal Regency)
The verb "prefer" is the ruling term of the sentence. Whenever the term ruler is a verb, we have a case of verbal rulership.
"Prefer" is a direct and indirect transitive verb, that is, it has two complements: a direct object and an indirect object.
The direct object (coffee) is the complement without preposition and the indirect object (tea) is the prepositioned complement.
Correct alternative: d) He is suspected of breaking into the store.
a) This technique is prone to error.
The regency of the sentence is correct. “Passable” is a name that requires the use of a complement starting with the preposition “of”. If the information were only “This technique is possible.”, we would ask ourselves “likely what?”.
The add-on answers that question: of error.
b) I am not knowledgeable on the subject.
The regency of the sentence is correct. The name “understood”, which in the sentence has the function of an adjective, requires the use of the preposition “in”.
who is understood, is understood in something.
The preposition “in” can be agglutinated with the articles, thus forming the contractions. Examples: “no” (em+o), “na” (em+a), “nos” (em+os) and “nas” (em+as).
c) The agreement was not favorable to them.
The regency of the above sentence is correct. The name “favorable”, as the ruling term of the phrase, makes it necessary to use the preposition “a”.
Who is favorable is favorable to something or someone
d) He is suspected of breaking into the store.
The regency of the sentence is wrong.
The correct sentence would be: d) He is suspicious in have broken into the store.
The name “suspicious” requires the use of the preposition “of”; whoever is suspicious is suspicious of something.
Correct alternative: c) We are convinced that he will come.
Check the explanations below
a) I don't like this movie because it makes an apology for violence.
The nominal regency of the phrase is wrong. Who does apology, does apology in something.
That is, the regent term “apology” requires that the ruled term begin with the preposition “of”.
So, the correct sentence would be: I don't like this movie because it makes apology gives violence.
b) I'm sure he'll get away with it.
The sentence has a nominal conducting error.
The name “certainty” is complemented by the preposition “of”; who is sure is sure in something.
So, the correct sentence would be: I'm sure in that he will get away with it.
c) We are convinced that he will come.
The sentence is correct as to the nominal regency.
“Convinced” is the ruling term of the sentence and “from which he will come” is the ruled term, that is, the complement.
Who is convinced, is convinced in something. Therefore, the name “convinced” must always start with the preposition “of”.
d) She is suspicious about the neighbor's version.
The nominal regency of the phrase is wrong.
Note that the name “distrustful” is the ruling term of the phrase, so it needs a ruling term.
Who is suspicious is suspicious in something. Therefore, the term ruled or complement must start with the preposition “of”. As the phrase speaks of a feminine term (version), the contraction of "de" + "a" = "da" was used.
Therefore, it would be correct to say: She is suspicious gives version of the neighbor.
Correct alternative: c) by – from – with
The name “anxious” requires a complement starting with the preposition “by”. Anyone who is anxious is looking forward to something.
Example: I am looking forward to be with my parents.
“Contemporâneo” is a name that requires a complement starting with the preposition “of”. Anyone who is contemporary is contemporary with something or someone.
Example: Guimarães Rosa was an author contemporary of Clarice Lispector.
“Merciful” is a name that admits complements that can start with “with”, “for with” or “for”.
Examples:
- He was merciful to the friends;
- He was merciful to the friends;
- He was merciful to the friends.
