The anarchism of science according to Feyerabend

protection click fraud

Paul Feyerabend represents the radicalization of the foundations of science. He postulates that science is a methodologically anarchic activity and that it is just one of the possible ways of life. This is because there are several factors that determine scientific development, from metaphysics to politics and economics.

According to Feyerabend, science, like religion, was unilaterally imposed by Western culture. However, although religion is no longer linked to the State and can be freely chosen, science it has not yet managed to dissociate itself (it would be better to say that the State has not yet managed to disassociate itself from the science). Just imagine, for example, how many projects there are that theoretically are viable, from a scientific point of view, such as water cars, hydrogen, etc., but which are shelved or not, they become a reality due to the interests of economic groups (oil, for example) that finance politicians to act in their favor.

For the philosopher, the choice for science is aesthetic, subjective, that is, it depends on an acceptance that is only massively adhered to because it was imposed as a superior way of life. Science, as knowledge, should not be distinguished from non-science, that is, from metaphysics, myth, poetry, etc., since, for Feyerabend, there is no methodological universality, which results in a theoretical pluralism, in which the forms of life and thought can coexist democratically.

instagram story viewer

Do not stop now... There's more after the advertising ;)

Feyerabend sees in justificationism an important and necessary interaction between the justification context it's the discovery context, since, isolated, they are harmful to science. It is an attempt to identify empirical knowledge, not from prescriptions (as for Popper) nor only from descriptions (as for Kuhn). It aims, therefore, to place the hypotheses in debate and voting as in a democratic society, since myth and science have the same structure, thus showing that the separation is artificial.

By João Francisco P. Cabral
Brazil School Collaborator
Graduated in Philosophy from the Federal University of Uberlândia - UFU
Master's student in Philosophy at the State University of Campinas - UNICAMP

Philosophy - Brazil School

Would you like to reference this text in a school or academic work? Look:

CABRAL, João Francisco Pereira. "The anarchism of science according to Feyerabend"; Brazil School. Available in: https://brasilescola.uol.com.br/filosofia/o-anarquismo-ciencia-segundo-feyerabend.htm. Accessed on June 27, 2021.

Teachs.ru

Ethics in Epicurus

Epicurus' doctrine arose at a time of dissatisfaction with the condition of the Greek City-States...

read more

Cave and Matrix Myth

Many must know the film matrix,but what not everyone knows is that it contains philosophical refe...

read more

Aquinas: biography, thought, work, phrases

Aquinas was a Catholic priest and disciple of the great scholastic Great Albert. He assisted in t...

read more
instagram viewer